Horizon 2020 Special | 9/12/16
Problems reading this newsletter? Click here

Horizon 2020: EUA members call for more competitiveness and efficiency

EUA has released the results of its 2016 member consultation on Horizon 2020. As the European Commission undertakes its mid-term review of the current Framework Programme for Research and Innovation and prepares discussions on its post-2020 successor, EUA invited its members to share their views and experiences with Horizon 2020.
member consultation
This EUA Special Edition Newsletter is dedicated to the results of the member consultation. The findings represent the voices of more than 150 universities from 28 countries across Europe and contain further reflections from EUA’s ongoing work on the Ninth Framework Programme, the European Innovation Council and the Public Funding Observatory.

European universities are key beneficiaries of the Framework Programme and staunch supporters of Horizon 2020, which is seen as highly successful. Indeed, EU-level funding for research and innovation based on grants and open competitive calls creates unparalleled added value and is paramount to retaining scientific talent and boosting Europe’s global competitiveness. Nevertheless, the EUA member consultation revealed that Horizon 2020 is endangered by critically low success rates due to insufficient funding at the EU and national levels. 

“This translates into higher participation costs, wasted research ideas, and greatly reduces the competitiveness of the European Research Area and the efficiency of public investment,” explains Thomas Estermann, EUA Director of Governance, Funding and Public Policy Development. 

Furthermore, respondents pointed out that despite progress on simplification, Horizon 2020 projects bear significant administrative and financial burdens given accounting and reporting complexities, as well as insufficient coverage of indirect costs. 

“Rigid and costly implementation undermines sustainability and capacity in retaining and attracting scientific talent, which hampers global competitiveness,” explains David Drewry, EUA Vice-President and Chair of the Research Policy Working Group. “Excellent, multidisciplinary, and collaborative university-based research is key to ensure societal progress and well-being in the long-term.” 

“Starting from the key principle of excellent research as main criterion for the selection and support of research projects, we need to find ways to connect more researchers to excellent research projects. Widening the base of excellence within the EU is necessary to participate in the global competition in the long run,” says Jan Mengelers, EUA Research Policy Working Group member. 

The university sector’s views provide the basis for a series of core messages and actions addressing the different issues identified with Horizon 2020. The leading principles include continuing to prioritise excellence as the main selection criteria, emphasising the value of collaborative research; broadening innovation and committing to long-term investments in research; further integrating social sciences and humanities; opening up research agenda setting; widening participation; clarifying the notion of impact and promoting open access to research publications and data.

Regarding funding and modalities, priorities include securing ambitious grant-based funding; enhancing programme efficiency and success rates; developing a strategic approach to efficiency and sustainability of research funding at European, national and institutional levels; improving cost coverage; enabling trust-based simplification and fostering EU funding synergies.

To read the full report, "EUA member consultation: A contribution to the Horizon 2020 mid-term review," please click here.

In November 2016, EUA also released the findings of its membership consultation on Erasmus+. To see that report, please click here.

National governments need to invest in efficiency of Horizon 2020

The first two years of Horizon 2020 show that the current Framework Programme for Research and Innovation has attracted more applications, more actors and more high quality proposals than ever before. Various evaluations also show that research funded through the FPs is among the best ways to obtain added value from European public investment.
Read more

Universities call to simplify Horizon 2020 where it matters most

For several generations of the Framework Programme, simplification has remained at the top of the implementation agenda. The European Commission had promised that Horizon 2020 would enhance simplification. The mid-term review of Horizon 2020 provides a timely opportunity to assess the extent to which the programme has delivered on its promises so far, and to define the scope for further simplification.
Read more

Horizon 2020 and beyond: EUA’s vision for the next Framework Programme

EUA has developed its initial vision on the design of the Ninth EU Framework Programme. Adopted by the EUA Council on 28 October 2016, the vision paper provides an early perspective on the main challenges ahead and outlines key areas, from the point of view of Europe’s universities, to be considered by the European Commission when planning the FP9.
Read more

University of Copenhagen: Investment in excellent research boosts European competitiveness

Thomas Bjørnholm of the University of Copenhagen and Universities Denmark calls for ambitious funding for research and innovation in order to drive competitiveness, economic growth and job creation in the future.
Read more

HRK: FP9 needs to provide space for better EU policy making and vision on universities

Horst Hippler of the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK) calls on EU policy makers to use the next Framework Programme for Research and Innovation to develop coherent policies that support universities and their key role in the knowledge economy, society and cultural sphere.
Read more

Norwegian University of Science and Technology: Horizon 2020 is a key priority, but high TRLs are a concern

Gunnar Bovim of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology praises Horizon 2020, but calls for solutions for problem areas such as insufficient funding, low success rates and excess priority for projects with high technology readiness levels.
Read more

Bialystok University of Technology: Horizon 2020 from the Polish perspective

Lech Dzienis of the Bialystok University of Technology explains why the next Framework Programme should address discrepancies in participation and funding across Europe's different university systems.
Read more

European University Association (EUA)
Next newsletter: 13 January 2017

If you want to unsubscribe, please send an email to info@eua.be.